· 5 min read
How to capture tacit knowledge with AI
Documents give AI agents the what. Learn how a 5 to 7 minute AI interview and three circles of context capture the how and the why. Checklist included.
ReadGuides, comparisons and research from the team building Dactic.
· 5 min read
Documents give AI agents the what. Learn how a 5 to 7 minute AI interview and three circles of context capture the how and the why. Checklist included.
ReadContext engineering is how teams give AI agents the right information at the right moment. A plain-English guide for operations leaders.
Traditional consulting: $300,000+ and 6+ months. Compare it with Dactic on cost, time to first agent, what you own and whether it stays current.
Should you build RAG in-house or use a context layer? A side-by-side on cost, upkeep, accuracy and what each one can capture.
Tacit AI means giving AI agents the judgment your best people never wrote down. Learn what it is, where it sits in the AI stack, and why it matters.
Compare five kinds of tools for capturing tribal knowledge before a key employee leaves, from wikis to AI interviewers, with a plan for the notice period.
Most AI agents fail at work for the same four reasons, and the model is rarely one of them. Here is what goes wrong and how teams fix it.
A context layer gives AI agents your systems, rules and unwritten know-how so they act like your best people. How it works and when you need one.
A vendor wants read access to your employees' email, chat, calendar, and files. In exchange, it will deploy autonomous agents into your workspace that take actions on behalf of your staff.
You built the RAG pipeline. Chunking is tuned, embeddings are solid, retrieval precision looks good on your eval set. The agent still gets things wrong in production, and the failures are strange.
Your team bought an AI tool. It works. Nobody uses it. That is not a contradiction. It is the most common outcome of enterprise AI deployment, and it happens for a reason that shows up nowhere on the invoice.